Tuna vs Chicken Breast: Nutrition Comparison
Tuna and chicken breast are the two most popular lean protein sources in fitness nutrition, and they are more similar than different. Both are low in fat, high in protein, and relatively low in calories. Canned tuna has a slight edge in convenience and cost, while chicken breast offers more versatility in cooking. Tuna provides more omega-3 fatty acids and is slightly lower in calories per 100g. Chicken breast tends to be more sodium-flexible since canned tuna can be high in sodium depending on the brand. Both are excellent staples for a high-protein diet.
Nutrition Comparison
| Nutrient |
1 Serving (106.0g)
|
1 Serving (106g)*
|
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 132.5 kcal | 116.6 kcal |
| Total Fat | 2.2 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated Fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Cholesterol | 68.9 mg | 61.5 mg |
| Sodium | 41.3 mg | 68.9 mg |
| Total Carbs | 0 g | 0 g |
| Dietary Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 24.4 g | 24.5 g |
* Nutrition data sourced from the USDA Food Central Database. Values marked with * have been normalized to match the larger serving size for a fair comparison. Individual products may vary.
Full Nutrition Details
See the complete nutrition breakdown for each food individually, including vitamins and minerals.