Tuna vs Salmon: Nutrition Comparison
Tuna and salmon are two of the most popular fish choices for health-conscious eaters, but they differ meaningfully in their nutritional profiles. Salmon is significantly higher in fat — particularly heart-healthy omega-3 fatty acids — while canned tuna is leaner and lower in calories, making it a popular choice for weight management. Both are excellent sources of high-quality protein and provide important micronutrients including B vitamins and selenium. The best choice depends on your goals: salmon edges ahead for omega-3 content and overall nutrient density, while tuna wins on calories and cost per gram of protein.
Nutrition Comparison
| Nutrient |
1 Serving (151g)*
|
1 Serving (151.0g)
|
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 188.8 kcal | 209.9 kcal |
| Total Fat | 3.2 g | 12 g |
| Saturated Fat | 0 g | 2 g |
| Cholesterol | 98.2 mg | 69.5 mg |
| Sodium | 58.9 mg | 104.2 mg |
| Total Carbs | 0 g | 0 g |
| Dietary Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 34.7 g | 23 g |
* Nutrition data sourced from the USDA Food Central Database. Values marked with * have been normalized to match the larger serving size for a fair comparison. Individual products may vary.
Full Nutrition Details
See the complete nutrition breakdown for each food individually, including vitamins and minerals.