Spinach vs Arugula: Nutrition Comparison
Spinach and arugula are both popular leafy greens that work well in salads, but they have distinct nutritional profiles and flavour characteristics. Spinach is significantly higher in iron, calcium, and folate per serving — making it particularly valuable for those at risk of iron deficiency. Arugula has a distinctive peppery flavour that adds complexity to dishes, and provides glucosinolates — compounds in the cruciferous family associated with potential health benefits. Both are very low in calories. For maximum iron and folate intake, spinach is the stronger choice. For flavour complexity and cruciferous phytonutrients, arugula is an excellent option. Rotating between the two gives you the best of both.
Nutrition Comparison
| Nutrient |
3 cup (85.0g)
|
1 Serving (85.0g)
|
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 20.4 kcal | 20.4 kcal |
| Total Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Cholesterol | 0 mg | 0 mg |
| Sodium | 64.6 mg | 24.6 mg |
| Total Carbs | 3 g | 3 g |
| Dietary Fiber | 2 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 2 g | 2 g |
* Nutrition data sourced from the USDA Food Central Database. Values marked with * have been normalized to match the larger serving size for a fair comparison. Individual products may vary.
Full Nutrition Details
See the complete nutrition breakdown for each food individually, including vitamins and minerals.