McDonald's Fries vs Burger King Fries: Nutrition Comparison
McDonald's and Burger King fries are among the most consumed fast food items in the world, and their nutritional profiles are strikingly similar. Both are made from potatoes, fried in vegetable oil, and seasoned with salt. McDonald's fries are famously thin-cut and known for their consistent crispiness, while Burger King's are slightly thicker. Calorie and sodium counts are very close between the two chains at comparable serving sizes. Neither is a health food, but as an occasional treat, the difference between them nutritionally is negligible. Portion size is a more meaningful variable than brand choice.
Nutrition Comparison
| Nutrient |
1 Medium Serving (100.0g)
|
1 Medium Serving (100.0g)
|
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 378 kcal | 370 kcal |
| Total Fat | 18 g | 16 g |
| Saturated Fat | 2.7 g | 2 g |
| Cholesterol | 0 mg | 0 mg |
| Sodium | 221 mg | 270 mg |
| Total Carbs | 50 g | 54 g |
| Dietary Fiber | 4.6 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 4 g | 5 g |
* Nutrition data sourced from the USDA Food Central Database. Values marked with * have been normalized to match the larger serving size for a fair comparison. Individual products may vary.
Full Nutrition Details
See the complete nutrition breakdown for each food individually, including vitamins and minerals.
More Fast Food Comparisons
- McDonald's Big Mac vs Burger King Whopper: Nutrition Comparison
- Chipotle Chicken Bowl vs Chipotle Steak Bowl: Nutrition Comparison
- Subway Turkey vs Chicken Breast: Nutrition Comparison
- Chick-fil-A Sandwich vs Popeyes Sandwich: Nutrition Comparison
- McDonald's McChicken vs Burger King Chicken Sandwich: Nutrition Comparison