Calories in Reduced Fat Beef Franks

📏 Serving Size: 1 Serving (45.0g)

🧪 Nutrition Facts

Amount Per Serving
  • Calories 99.9
  • Total Fat 8.0 g
  • Saturated Fat 3.0 g
  • Cholesterol 25.2 mg
  • Sodium 500.0 mg
  • Potassium 180.0 mg
  • Total Carbohydrate 2.0 g
  • Dietary Fiber 0.0 g
  • Sugars 0.0 g
  • Protein 5.0 g
Vitamins & Minerals
  • Vitamin A 0.0 IU
  • Vitamin B-12 0.0 µg
  • Vitamin B-6 0.0 mg
  • Vitamin C 0.0 mg
  • Vitamin D 0.0 IU
  • Vitamin E 0.0 mg
  • Calcium 0.0 mg
  • Copper 0.0 mg
  • Folate 0.0 µg
  • Iron 0.7 mg
  • Magnesium 0.0 mg
  • Manganese 0.0 mg
  • Niacin 0.0 mg
  • Pantothenic Acid 0.0 mg
  • Phosphorus 0.0 mg
  • Riboflavin 0.0 mg
  • Thiamin 0.0 mg
  • Zinc 0.0 mg

Note: Nutrition information comes from the USDA Food Central Database. Daily values are based on a 2,000 calorie per day diet (FDA). Actual requirements vary by individual. Use at your own risk.

📋 Nutrition Summary

Reduced Fat Beef Franks contains 99.9 calories per serving (1 Serving (45.0g)), a moderate amount that fits easily into most daily calorie goals. The majority of its calories come from fat (8.0g, 72% of calories), including 3.0g of saturated fat.

🏷️ Diet & Nutrition Tags

✅ Low Carb / Keto-Friendly ✅ Low Calorie ⚠️ High Saturated Fat

Tags are generated automatically from USDA nutrition data using standard dietary thresholds. They are for general guidance only and are not medical advice.

📝 Ingredients

Beef, Water, Modified Potato Starch*, Contains 2% or Less of: Sodium Lactate, Salt, Hydrolyzed Soy Protein, Flavoring, Paprika, Potassium Chloride, Potassium Phosphate, Sodium Diacetate, Garlic Powder, Sodium Erythorbate, Sodium Nitrite.

🔬 Ingredient Analysis

⚠️ Artificial Preservatives ⚠️ Emulsifiers / Stabilisers ⚠️ Flavour Enhancers

Artificial Preservatives: Sodium Nitrite, Sodium Diacetate

Emulsifiers / Stabilisers: Modified Potato Starch

Flavour Enhancers: Hydrolyzed Soy Protein

Detected additives are based on the ingredient list in the USDA Food Central Database. Always read the full product label as formulations can change. Presence of these ingredients does not necessarily indicate a health risk — consult a healthcare professional for personalised dietary advice.

🤖 AI Nutrition Coach

AI POWERED

Ask anything about Reduced Fat Beef Franks — how it fits your diet, what to pair it with, or how it compares nutritionally.

5 questions remaining

📊 % Daily Value

The following shows how one serving of Reduced Fat Beef Franks contributes to the recommended daily intake for key nutrients, based on a 2,000 calorie diet.

Nutrient Amount % Daily Value
Calories99.9 kcal5%
Total Fat8.0 g10%
Saturated Fat3.0 g15%
Cholesterol25.2 mg8%
Sodium500.0 mg22%
Total Carbohydrate2.0 g1%
Protein5.0 g10%
Iron0.7 mg4%
Potassium180.0 mg4%

* Percent Daily Values are based on a 2,000 calorie diet. Your daily values may be higher or lower depending on your calorie needs. ✅ marks ≥20% DV (FDA "good source" threshold); ⭐ marks ≥100% DV (a full day's value).

🔥 Calorie Analysis

Reduced Fat Beef Franks accounts for 5% of a standard 2,000 calorie daily diet per serving. The majority of the calories for this food comes from fat. Fat makes up 72% of the calories.

Fat 72%
Protein 20%
Fat 72% Carbs 8% Protein 20%

🏃 Exercise Burn Time

How long would it take to burn off the 99.9 calories in Reduced Fat Beef Franks? The table below shows burn time for a 170-pound person doing common exercises.

Exercise Minutes to Burn
Running: 10 minutes per mile 7.6 min
Walking: 17 minutes per mile 17.2 min
Cycling (Low Intensity) 10.9 min
HIIT 9.3 min
Snow Shoveling 14.0 min

Find more information on calories burned doing popular exercises.

💬 Nutrition Q&A: Reduced Fat Beef Franks

Is Reduced Fat Beef Franks good for weight loss?

These franks are relatively low in calories at 100 per piece, but the 8g of fat and minimal fiber mean they won't keep you feeling full for long. They work better as an occasional protein component in a meal rather than a standalone food for weight loss.

Is Reduced Fat Beef Franks heart-healthy?

The saturated fat content at 3g per frank is moderate but not ideal for heart health, and the high sodium is a concern for blood pressure management. The low cholesterol (25.2mg) is a minor positive, but overall these aren't recommended as a regular choice for heart-healthy eating.

How does Reduced Fat Beef Franks fit a low-sodium diet?

With 500mg of sodium per frank, this product doesn't fit comfortably into a low-sodium diet—a single frank represents 22% of a typical 2,300mg daily limit. You'd need to account for this carefully if you're managing sodium intake.

What diets does Reduced Fat Beef Franks suit?

These work for omnivorous, flexitarian, and standard Western diets as a quick protein option. They're not suitable for vegetarian or vegan diets, and the sodium load makes them less ideal for low-sodium or strict heart-healthy eating plans.

What should I watch out for with Reduced Fat Beef Franks?

At 500mg of sodium per frank, these are quite salty and can quickly eat into your daily limit, especially if you eat more than one. The product also contains sodium nitrite, a preservative that some people prefer to limit, and offers minimal nutritional benefit beyond basic protein.

Nutrition Q&A answers are based on USDA nutritional data and are for general informational purposes only. They are not a substitute for professional dietary or medical advice.

📰 Featured Blog Post

Fruits Ranked by Calories: The Complete Guide Fruits Ranked by Calories: The Complete Guide

This is the complete reference guide to fruit nutrition — covering calories, sugar, fibre, and the best fruits for specific dietary goals. Use the links below to jump to the section most relevant to your needs, or browse the full rankings below. Complete Fruit Calorie Rankings Here are the most common fruits ranked by calories per 100g, from lowest to highest: Watermelon — 30 cal See nutrition Strawberries — 32 cal See nutrition Cantaloupe — 34 cal See nutrition Peach — 39 cal See nutrition Grapefruit — 42 cal See nutrition Blackberries — 43 cal See nutrition Orange — 47 cal See nutrition Pineapple — 50 cal See nutrition Apple — 52 cal See nutrition Raspberries — 52 cal See nutrition Blueberries — 57 cal See nutrition Dragon fruit — 60 cal See nutrition Mango — 60 cal See nutrition Kiwi — 61 cal See nutrition Cherries — 63 cal See nutrition Grapes — 67 cal See nutrition Banana — 89 cal See nutrition Avocado — 160 cal See nutrition Core Rankings Lowest Calorie Fruits Ranked — watermelon, strawberries, and raspberries lead the list Highest Calorie Fruits Ranked — avocado, banana, and mango top the list Fruits Ranked by Sugar Content — avocado and berries are lowest; banana and grapes are highest Fruits Ranked by Fiber Content — raspberries, blackberries, and avocado lead Best Fruits for Weight Loss — berries, grapefruit, and apple are the top choices Fresh vs Other Formats Fresh vs Frozen Fruit — nutritionally similar, frozen wins for out-of-season fruit Dried vs Fresh Fruit — dried fruit has 4-8x more calories per gram Fruit Juice vs Whole Fruit — whole fruit wins on fibre, satiety, and blood sugar impact Smoothie vs Whole Fruit — smoothies can contain 300-600 calories; whole fruit is more filling Diet and Use Case Low Sugar Fruits for Diabetics — berries, avocado, and grapefruit are the best choices Keto Friendly Fruits Ranked — avocado, raspberries, and blackberries fit keto macros Best Fruits Before a Workout — banana, mango, and watermelon are top choices Best Fruits After a Workout — tart cherries, banana, and blueberries lead for recovery Seasonal and Exotic Tropical Fruits Ranked by Calories — from 30-cal papaya to 160-cal avocado Summer Fruits Ranked by Calories — watermelon, strawberries, peaches, and cherries Winter Fruits Ranked by Calories — citrus, kiwi, pomegranate, and pears Dragon Fruit vs Kiwi — kiwi wins on vitamin C; dragon fruit wins on iron Fruit Comparisons For detailed side-by-side nutrition comparisons see: Apple vs Banana Blueberries vs Strawberries Avocado vs Apple Blueberries vs Banana Using Our Fruit Nutrition Tools Track your daily fruit intake with our Food Tracker.

Read Post →